← Back to the evidence Work with PS

What are you trying to solve?

Four lines is enough. Pick the closest description, say what is actually worrying you, and you will get a straight answer about whether this is something worth doing together.

What is this about?

Keynote or conference talk A session for a conference, a staff day, or a sector event. Teacher AI literacy training Hands-on work with teaching staff at a school, a group of schools, or a district. Leadership needs to understand the AI landscape For heads, boards and senior teams deciding what to adopt, what to refuse, and what the EU AI Act now requires. Full-day comprehensive AI workshop The most ground covered in a single visit: readiness diagnosis, hands-on practice, and the governance conversation in one day. Media comment or expert interview Broadcast, print or podcast, on AI in education, AI literacy, or the regulation of both. Something else Advisory work, a research collaboration, or a one-to-one session. Describe it below.

Your organisation

What is the concern behind it? The more specific, the more useful the reply. Timing, audience size and budget range all help.

Your email

This site has no server and stores nothing. Sending opens your own email application with the message written out and addressed, so you can read it before it goes and it arrives from your own address. If your device has no mail application set up, write to prshenoy@jyu.fi directly and the same details are just as welcome in your own words.

Or simply

Get in touch directly

Email prshenoy@jyu.fi Read daily. The surest route.

WhatsApp Finland, UTC+2. Good for anything time-sensitive.

One thing worth saying in advance. Sessions usually run to about ninety minutes, but the shape of one is set after a training needs analysis with your own leadership, never before it. Diagnosing the gap first is the argument this research makes, so it would be odd to work any other way.